Linky
Bell Canada has considered the potential NPA Codes to be used to provide relief for NPA 289/905 and proposes that NPA Code 365 be implemented for relief of 289/905 as it would require the minimum quantity of software upgrades to support existing local dialling between NPA 289/905 and its neighbouring NPAs.
In addition, due to the fact that the future demand for CO Codes in NPA 289/905 has been volatile in recent NRUFs and that the 289/905 region has been forecast to exhaust twice in the next 20 year period in both the 2008 and 2009 Annual G-NRUF, it is recommended that NPA Code 367 be reserved for future subsequent relief in the 289/905 region. Alternatively, due to the potential for significant customer confusion if both 365 and 367 are assigned in the same region, NPA Code 742 could be reserved for future relief in the 289/365/905 region which could significantly reduce customer confusion between NPAs with very similar numbers, even though it is not optimal for relief.
In addition, as it is designated as unassignable in both of NPAs 289/905 and 416/647, it is recommended that NPA Code 437 be reserved for future relief in the 416/647 region, if relief of that region is not provided at the same time as relief of NPA 289/905.
I kinda like 365, so I'm happy. I also like the idea of setting aside 367 as well. I can understand using 742 instead, but it doesn't sound as good. So in a few years it'll be 289/365/905.
437 for 416/647? S'all right I guess. Would prefer 474. But I guess we'll see when 416/647 undergoes its relief planning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment